<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edda &amp; Hermetica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gangleri.nl/articles/47/edda-hermetica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gangleri.nl/articles/47/edda-hermetica/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:54:18 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.gangleri.nl/articles/47/edda-hermetica/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangleri.nl/articles/?p=47#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Quite a Traditionalist tone Ernesto! You are right when you mention the larger and smaller mysteries and from the well-known Northern sources it is usually not clear if they refer to either, if any. The comparison is superficial, agreed. The article mostly concerned my amasement of 5,5 years ago when I recognised certain symbolism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a Traditionalist tone Ernesto! You are right when you mention the larger and smaller mysteries and from the well-known Northern sources it is usually not clear if they refer to either, if any. The comparison is superficial, agreed. The article mostly concerned my amasement of 5,5 years ago when I recognised certain symbolism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernesto casado</title>
		<link>http://www.gangleri.nl/articles/47/edda-hermetica/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>ernesto casado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangleri.nl/articles/?p=47#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Creo que estas en una busqueda infructuosa, aunque sea solo por curiosidad.
Todas las tradiciones verdaderas, comienzan en el &#039;&#039;orden de los principios&#039;&#039;,solo accesible al intelecto puro, luego desarrollan una versión del orden creativo, y luego del orden formativo, propio de esa civilizacion o cultura, con sus caracteristicas psicologicas y mentales propias, que es donde difieren, pero no en el orden de los principios.
Siempre ,el agente creador es el Verbo o Logos, por lo cual conocer profundamente el idioma sagrado de esa civilización, es fundamental para su comprension profunda, y creo que esto es imposible si su cadena de transmision está rota.
para la zaga del norte, habría que dominar muy bien, el idioma de los bardos antiguos, me refiero a la edad de piedra, y seguir su devenir y mutacion en las siguientes eras.
Con respecto al hermetismo, tenemos material cuasi completo, con respecto a los misterios menores, pero nada de los misterios mayores.
por lo tanto, de las dos civilizaciones puestas en comparacion, podemos decir que comparten ,ser restos de cadenas iniciaticas rotas, solo curiosidades.
Ernesto Casado.

[edited by Roy]Ernesto seems to think that everybody speaks Spanish. Because I doubt that, here is a translation by by the Google translator:

I think these in a fruitless search, if only for curiosity.
All true traditions, start in the order of principles&#039;&#039;,&#039;&#039;only accessible to pure intellect, then develop a version of the creative order, and after the training order, characteristic of that civilization or culture, with its mental and psychological characteristics own, which is where they differ, but not in the order of the principles.
Always, the creative agent is the Word or Logos, so profoundly know the sacred language of that civilization, it is essential for deep understanding, and I think this is impossible if his chain of transmission is broken.
to the rear of the north, would have to master very well, the language of the ancient bards, I refer to the stone age, and follow their evolution and mutation in the following eras.
With respect to secrecy, we have quasi material complete with respect to the minor mysteries, but nothing of the greater mysteries.
therefore, of the two civilizations brought into comparison, we can say that they share, initiatic be remnants of broken chains, just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creo que estas en una busqueda infructuosa, aunque sea solo por curiosidad.<br />
Todas las tradiciones verdaderas, comienzan en el &#8221;orden de los principios&#8221;,solo accesible al intelecto puro, luego desarrollan una versión del orden creativo, y luego del orden formativo, propio de esa civilizacion o cultura, con sus caracteristicas psicologicas y mentales propias, que es donde difieren, pero no en el orden de los principios.<br />
Siempre ,el agente creador es el Verbo o Logos, por lo cual conocer profundamente el idioma sagrado de esa civilización, es fundamental para su comprension profunda, y creo que esto es imposible si su cadena de transmision está rota.<br />
para la zaga del norte, habría que dominar muy bien, el idioma de los bardos antiguos, me refiero a la edad de piedra, y seguir su devenir y mutacion en las siguientes eras.<br />
Con respecto al hermetismo, tenemos material cuasi completo, con respecto a los misterios menores, pero nada de los misterios mayores.<br />
por lo tanto, de las dos civilizaciones puestas en comparacion, podemos decir que comparten ,ser restos de cadenas iniciaticas rotas, solo curiosidades.<br />
Ernesto Casado.</p>
<p>[edited by Roy]Ernesto seems to think that everybody speaks Spanish. Because I doubt that, here is a translation by by the Google translator:</p>
<p>I think these in a fruitless search, if only for curiosity.<br />
All true traditions, start in the order of principles&#8221;,&#8221;only accessible to pure intellect, then develop a version of the creative order, and after the training order, characteristic of that civilization or culture, with its mental and psychological characteristics own, which is where they differ, but not in the order of the principles.<br />
Always, the creative agent is the Word or Logos, so profoundly know the sacred language of that civilization, it is essential for deep understanding, and I think this is impossible if his chain of transmission is broken.<br />
to the rear of the north, would have to master very well, the language of the ancient bards, I refer to the stone age, and follow their evolution and mutation in the following eras.<br />
With respect to secrecy, we have quasi material complete with respect to the minor mysteries, but nothing of the greater mysteries.<br />
therefore, of the two civilizations brought into comparison, we can say that they share, initiatic be remnants of broken chains, just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
